Edward McCartan (II) – Some daring elegance

This is a second gallery with carefully selected and adequately presented images of sculptures by Edward Francis McCartan (Albany, NY, 1879-1947), among the big lot that one may find on the Web -many of them with low resolution and wrong captions.

I will add very few comments (if any) and explanations about them in this post, since I fairly think that the works speak by themselves, and do it eloquently.

I have chosen three bronzes:

 

Diana and Hound, 1920, in the Chazen Museum of Art, Madison, Wisconsin:

edward-mccartan-diana-and-hound-1920-2-adj
Diana and Hound (1920 – bronze – lat. left)

edward-mccartan-diana-and-hound-1920-4-adj
Diana and Hound (1920 – bronze – front)


Another Diana (with another hound) of a smaller size and slightly more stylised, with slimmer and taller figures, both the woman and the dog. (This sculpture belongs to a private collection) :

Edward McCartan Tutt'Art@
Diana with hound (1922 -bronze; heigh: 58.4 cm)


Isoult, with a dove, 1926 – National Gallery of Art, Washington DC.:

edward-mccartan-isoult-1926-dipt
Isoult (1926 – bronze; overall size: 211 x 124.5 x 74 cm)

isoult-1926-adj
Isoult (1926 – bronze – front)

isoult-1926-head-adj
Isoult (1926 – bronze – head)


This post is a follow-up of another one in this same blog. You may watch it here:

Edward McCartan (I) – The gentle eroticism

5 thoughts on “Edward McCartan (II) – Some daring elegance

  1. The image of the Diana w/ Hound bronze 1922 is a fake or really bad reproduction. There are many being sold posthumously that are not his work but reproductions and I have observed this for many years. There is a larger version which is now being called a reproduction which it is…Heavy handed and lacking the classical grace so apparent with McCartan’s sculptures. Sadly many examples of his work up for auction or on eBay in bronze have been terribly reproduced and it is quite evident by bad proportions and naturally bad sculpting work.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks a lot for your comment, Michael 🙂
      I didn’t know that the 1922 variation I posted was a hoax or something not genuine. I noticed all the differences, but in fact I liked them (the straigther, more Greek, nose, the longer and slimmer legs, etc.). I will try to ascertain its falsity, and if so, I will ammend the post and perhaps delete the pictures.
      As for many other, more recent reproductions, found on eBay and elsewhere, I really hate them just as you do.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s